In-Ear Fidelity

Sennheiser HD560S Review: The Evolved 500

Table of Contents

Special thanks to Zeppelin & Co. for the glam shot of their demo unit.


For the longest time, Sennheiser’s HD500 series have been relegated as the “if you can’t afford the HD600 or HD650, get these instead” models of the open-backed lineup. And up till the release of the market-disrupting $220 HD6XX by Drop (Massdrop at the time), they were mainstay recommendations for newbies getting into the game.

But unfortunately the HD6XX does exist and so Sennheiser faces a very real problem: cannibalisation. Why buy a HD599 when the HD6XX exists? It’s just $20 extra and you get what is arguably a superior headphone in virtually every way. So when your $200 model risks being made completely irrelevant by a competing product from the same company, what is Sennheiser to do?

Why, make their $200 headphone just as good as the $220 cannibal of course. On paper, at least.

Sennheiser doesn’t quite claim that, but hype has been slowly building where the HD560S may be a viable replacement for the legendary HD6X0 headphones. My interest was piqued but now they have my attention. Is the HD560S all that’s cropped up to be?

Product page:

MSRP: $200

Driver type: Dynamic

Signature & Tonality

Not sure how to read graphs? Click here

The HD560S can be described as simply “neutral”. Some may argue that it’s closer to being “bright-neutral”, but in comparison to something like the HD800S it’s not as peaky.

Let’s put it to rest: the HD560S really is one of the best-tuned headphones you can get on the market today, price not even being a consideration. The midrange has no errant peaks or dips, the treble isn’t overly recessed nor boosted to the high heavens, and the bass extends nicely into the lowest octaves with just the mildest bump in the mid-bass for punchiness.

That means its tonality is flawless, right? What’s the catch?

The potential dealbreaker here is in the treble response. With its neutral lower midrange and relatively light note weight, its 5k-ishHz boost gets a little intense and harsh at times. Now you’ve probably already read some impressions on the HD560S and this peak; some say it’s completely benign and not worth the worry. Others claim it’s the worst thing in the world and will pierce your ears with the might of Zeus.

Me personally? I take a more moderate position. My initial listens with the HD560S had me noticing the more forward upper-midrange/lower-treble quite a bit, especially since I was comparing directly with the HD650 at the time. But as I compared with more and more headphones, it was far less egregious than other models which had far more destructive quirks handwaved off by the general populus. Make no mistake, the HD560S is no HD800. Or DT880. Or any other mainstream Beyerdynamic, really.

(Do note that unit variation may potentially be a thing here, some reviewers have gotten units that have quite a bit more treble than what I listened to.)

My litmus test for you is this: if you can handle the Hifiman Sundara, you can handle the HD560S.

Comparison courtesy of the Graph Comparison Tool

The closest thing in tuning to the HD560S within the Sennheiser lineup, in my opinion, would be the HD600. It’s far less warm than the HD650 and, while the upper-mid/treble emphasis does evoke a sense of “HD800ish-ness” due to its intensity and relative forwardness, I would say that the overall tonality is actually better done on the HD560S.

But still, going from the 560S to the 600 is like milk after a spicy curry. The HD600 still remains as one of my tonal benchmarks for headphones, and highlights the little quirks that would make me avoid the HD560S as a true daily driver.

So in reference to overall tonality (IMO, YMMV, audio is subjective and all that), here is my hierarchy for Sennheiser’s models:

HD600 > HD560S > HD650/HD6XX > HD800/S > HD660S > HD599/HD579 > HD559 > HD820

Tone grade: A+

For more information on the grading system, click here


Here’s where things can kind of see-saw-y for the HD560S.

Detail and resolution: decent. A hefty improvement from the HD599 but not quite to the level of the HD6X0. Most people would be satisfied with this level of resolving ability.

Bass: not great in terms of texturing and overall impact. The HD560S’ sub-bass is audible, but rather limp and not very realistic. It basically extends even more than a Clear on paper, but the difference in presentation is extremely stark. You would not be getting a HD560S for bass.

Soundstage: pretty dang wide and spacious. Would be top-tier for live tracks and gaming, if not for…

Imaging: a little weird. Vocals are up front and centre all the time and instruments tend to blend together despite the wide stage they are placed in.

Like for tonality, here is my personal hierarchy for the technical performance of Sennheiser’s headphones:

HD800/S > HD600 >= HD660S > HD650/HD6XX >= HD820 >= HD560S > HD599 > HD579 > HD559

Technical grade: B

For more information on the grading system, click here


If you can get the HD600 for a similar price to the HD560S, I’d say that the HD600 is still the overall superior headphone. The HD600 offers similar clarity with better detail retrieval, really only losing out on soundstage width. Nowadays the HD600 goes for about $250 to $300, so while it is the better headphone (IMO anyways), you’d also have to shell out a bit more cash for that extra performance.

With fresh pads, the HD650/HD6XX (at least, the 2020 production model) basically trade blows with the HD560S. I’m of the opinion that the HD600 is better than the HD650, so do take note of that context when I say this: I’d rather have the HD560S to the HD650. I’m personally not a fan of the warmth and congested staging of the HD650, the latter of which is some of the worst that I’ve heard in an open-backed headphone. The HD560S trades a bit of raw resolution for a far more pleasant and immersive staging experience.

In all honesty, I wouldn’t be too mad if Sennheiser named this the HD620 or something. Assuming of course that they beef up the construction materials because while it’s almost HD6X0-tier sound, the build quality still screams “yes, I’m a HD500 headphone”.

At $200… we may have a “default recommendation” contender here. The tuning is not too spicy so as to offend the sensibilities of the average newbie, it doesn’t have any complete dealbreaker flaws and I’d daresay provides a bit more excitement than the stone-cold AKG K612 Pro, which is a $200 anomaly by itself.

The HD560S exists in a price bracket where it doesn’t have much (if any) competition. Now all the market needs to do is catch up.

Value Rating: ★★

“Redefines the price bracket”
For more information on the grading system, click here


At its very worst, the HD560S is an evolution of the HD500 series that doesn’t really deserve to be in the same conversation as the HD599. At its very best, the HD560S trade blows with the HD6X0. As always, the truth is usually somewhere in middle; where exactly it is up to you to find out.

For this particular reviewer, the HD560S should be on the shortlist for anyone in the market for a sub-$200 neutral headphone. Now, if only Sennheiser can take a look at their aging HD800…

Grade: B ★★

Awarded grades are in reference to the Ranking List.

Support me on Patreon to get access to tentative ranks, the exclusive “Clubhouse” Discord server and/or access to the Premium Graph Comparison Tool! My usual thanks to all my current supporters and shoutouts to my big money boys:

Man Ho

16 thoughts on “Sennheiser HD560S Review: The Evolved 500”

  1. Interesting read! I’m surprised these are able to match/even surpass the value of the 6XX. By the way, have you listened to the 58X? I’d really wanna hear your take on those.

  2. Got these a few weeks ago, havent picked up any of my other open headphones since.
    Still using the MDR-Z7 in the office but i agree that the 560 is really great value, i think they should do a PRO version with better build, plusher pads, better cable (shorter at least!) I would buy that in a heartbeat.

    1. OH, YES. I second the cable opinion. I do love my 560S, but I always wonder why they chose such a long cable, I might make one and call it a day; it always looked like an oversight to me.

  3. Great. I think the 560S is the perfect headphone for me. Currently I’m running HD579 and I use it for mixing/producing music, gaming, and music in general. This time I’m not looking for a jack of all trades, but a great linear, flat mixing headphone. I think this is gonna be it. It even beats K702 and DT990 Pro on paper. What do you think?

  4. Would be interesting to have a mid-fi / lower-mid-fi comparison review. AKG K612s vs 560s look really interesting to me same with the rating of the R70x compared to the 600/6XX and the other usual mid-fi go tos.

  5. Hello Crinacle, thanks for the excellent detailed review. If you happen to see this comment, I’m wanting to decide between the HD560S for the ATH-R70X. The choice sounds odd, but I’m looking for an open-back headphone under $400 with solid bass, and it seems these 2 beat out the HD6X0 in that regard.

    I see the HD560S has better bass extension as you mentioned, but R70X’s doesn’t look too bad either for an open-back. Which of these do you prefer for presentation in the sub-bass range?

    1. Reading this from almost exactly a year later, I find myself to be at the same crossroads. Which of the two have you chosen and why? I am also trying to make this decision 🙂

  6. Great for the price and a big step above the 598/599, of course.

    After the initial hype went down, the 560s experienced quite a bit of backlash, somewhat magnifying its flaws.

    Surely there is a slight treble spike, but anyone who experienced a DT 880 or DT 1990 pro would emphasize the word “slight”.

    Surely the technical capabilities are a notch below the 600 series. If equalized to the same curve, a HD 660s may have a narrower soundstage, but this comes with a pin-point-accurate imaging, while the 560s may show a slight blur here. Is the 660s worth the (at least) double price? You may answer that for yourself, but the bang-for-the-buck-ratio for me is better in the 560s.

  7. Got these two days ago, and until then I used 598SE corrected by Sonarworks. For the 560S I don’t really need correction, except on the monitoring bus of my DAW when mixing.

    So my trusty old 598SE with new earpads went to my brother…

  8. Thank god it has the “cheap” HD500 series construction, because with that comes the removable 2.5mm (which can easily be transformed into a 3.5mm) input, making it potentially the best headset around.

  9. The value of the 560S is indisputable. In my country, I would need to spend 1.81X more money to get the HD 600, this makes the 560S the default choice at the price range. I only wish the cable wasn’t so long, but hey, you can always buy an aftermarket one.

  10. Do someone knows why there is two measurements S1 and S2 in the database?

    Those are quite different from one to another.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

First impressions

Simgot EK3: Unboxing

Introduction The EK3 is Simgot’s newest flagship IEM, also representing their first foray into balanced armature technologies. Simgot has traditionally

Read More »