AKA: I mass-dump all average IEMs into the ranking list
I’m someone who tries a lot of stuff as I go along. IEMs for sure, but headphones too, and other source-level components if I’m curious. And regardless of what other reviewers may tell you, a huge chunk of them are… average.
To be fair, that’s the whole definition of “average” in the first place. You need the Average Joes to exist in order to contrast with the true blue Brilliant Bruces, else the term “better than most” just loses its lustre. After all, a weird troll doll once said: “when everyone’s super, no one will be“.
These are the entries that I feel no desire writing more about. They are average (or lower) in my own definition, and so makes them even harder to write for. I have the linguistic capacity to praise the greats and admonish the scum, but what about everything else in between? Those are the hardest things to write for, and I find myself in the worst kind of the writer’s block every time I’m obliged to write something about them.
So I say, skip it all. No point locking these Insignificants away in the Patreon vault forever, so I’ll just dump them all in the ranking list right here, right now.
Perhaps the word “Insignificant” is a little too heavy-handed to describe some of the following IEMs considering that they may be average-sounding, but priced so cheaply that they create their own value. But at the end of the day, they aren’t exactly great in their own right but rather great in terms of their price tags.
The following table is arranged according to the grade awarded.
Model | Grade | MSRP | Signature | Comments | Driver setup |
Unique Melody Mason V3+ | A- | 3200 | Bright neutral | Decent resolution, nothing really special otherwise. | 16BA |
Lime Ears Aether R | B | 1350 | Variable | A downgrade from the original with weirder midrange tonality. | 6BA |
Kinera Nanna | B- | 850 | Mild V-shape | Surprisingly good implementation of the EST tweeters, but lacking details. | 2EST 1BA 1DD |
qdc Fusion | B- | 920 | Warm | Dulled transients and lacks detailing. Tonality is merely okay. | 4BA 1DD |
Tansio Mirai TSMR-5 | B- | 430 | Variable | Alright tonality, decent detailing but nothing that makes it stand out. | 5BA |
CCA C10 | C+ | 40 | V-shaped | Surprisingly well-tuned hybrid from a KZ-style company. Definitely the best in its lineup. | 4BA 1DD |
Future Sonics MG5HX | C+ | 875 | V-shaped | Typical V-shaped DD signature with minimal focus on technicalities. | DD |
Shuoer Tape | C+ | 130 | V-shaped | Decent technicalities but it basically screams in your face. | “Electrostatic” |
Tanchjim Cora | C+ | 50 | V-shaped | Well-controlled bass boost, though coupled with a slightly odd midrange tonality. | DD |
Audiosense T800 | C | 300 | V-shaped | Generic tuning that’s nothing special in terms of tonal accuracy nor technicalities. | 8BA |
BGVP ES12 | C | 1500 | Variable | Slightly honky midrange tonality with the usual EST tweeter roll-off. | 4EST 8BA |
CCA C12 | C | 50 | V-shaped | Nothing much to say; typical KZ-style tuning with shouty midrange and subpar technicalities. | 5BA 1DD |
iBasso IT03w | C | 260 | Bright V-shape | Its sibilant and sharp treble is a tough trait to endure. | 2BA 1DD |
IMR R1 Zenith | C | Variable | Not very detailed with a persistently odd tonal balance regardless of filters used. | 1Piezo 1DD | |
KZ ZSN Pro | C | 20 | V-shaped | Nothing much to say; typical KZ-style tuning with shouty midrange and subpar technicalities. | 1BA 1DD |
Noble M3 | C | 600 | V-shaped | Strident and harsh midrange only saved by its somewhat competent bass presentation. | 1MS 1DD |
Stax SR-001 Mk1 w/ CES-A1 | C | Neutral | Sounds surprisingly dull and undetailed for a “true” electrostatic. | Electrostatic | |
Tiandirenhe TD1 | C | 25 | V-shaped | Generic V-shaped DD with alright midrange tonality and technicalities. | DD |
Unknown Custom UCD-2 | C | 220 | Warm V-shape | A common 2-driver signature with passable resolution. | 2BA |
Venture Electronics BIE | C | 20 | V-shaped | Generic V-shaped DD with alright midrange tonality and technicalities. | DD |
Brainwavz B400 | C- | 150 | Neutral | Dulled transients and dynamics makes this a boring listen. | 4BA |
Cayin YB04 | C- | 500 | “Balanced” | An odd take on neutrality that sounds weird and uneven. | 4BA |
Fatfreq Eden | C- | 220 | “Balanced” | A strange sounding monitor with no clear direction in its tuning. | 2BA |
Heir Audio Tzar 350 | C- | Bright | Its detail would be appreciated if it didn’t come with ear-splitting treble. | 2BA | |
I-INTO i8 | C- | 25 | “Balanced” | Somewhat downsloping signature. It’s an IEM that exists. | 3DD |
Kinera IDUN Deluxe | C- | 140 | V-shaped | Not a bad hybrid, considering Kinera’s track record. | 2BA 1DD |
KZ ZS3 | C- | 10 | V-shaped | Simple DD tuning. It’s an IEM that exists. | DD |
Meccaudio ME-04 | C- | Neutral | A not-quite-neutral “neutral” monitor. | 4BA | |
Pai Audio DM2A | C- | 140 | V-shaped | Weird midrange. Oddly similar to the Kinera IDUN. | 2BA 1DD |
Stax SR-001 Mk1 | C- | Warm | Sounds like an old-school on-ear headphone from the 80s. | Electrostatic | |
Tin HiFi T1 | C- | 36 | Warm | Could use some more high frequency response. Seems like squandered potential. | DD |
TRN BA5 | C- | 70 | V-shaped | Low resolution, passable tonality. | 5BA |
Venture Electronics Duke | C- | Warm | Oddly tuned dynamic, but at least it’s not the Monk IEs. | DD | |
fineEars TSH-HR1000K | D+ | 70 | V-shaped | Pretty decent tonality but is severely lacking details. | DD |
KZ AS16 | D+ | 125 | V-shaped | Nothing much to say; typical KZ-style tuning with shouty midrange and subpar technicalities. | 8BA |
Unknown Custom Quad 2.0 | D+ | 390 | V-shaped | Low-resolution, low-detail, passable tonality. | 4BA |
Unknown Custom Juno | D+ | 640 | Variable | Something odd going on in the midrange. Same issues in resolution. | 6BA |
AAW ACH/Kingfisher | D | 190 | Warm | Persasive warmth just puts a blanket on all the transients. Lacks definition. | 1Piezo 1BA 1DD |
Audio Technica ATH-IEX1 | D | 1200 | V-shaped | Sounds weird, sounds wrong, needs a complete overhaul. | 2BA 2DD |
Campfire Equinox | D | 1500 | Bassy | Extremely different from the Atlas. It’s a lot worse. | DD |
CCA A10 | D | 60 | Bright V-shape | Typical KZ-style tuning with even shoutier midrange. | 5BA |
Unknown Custom UCD-3 | D | 270 | Warm | Mushy, blunted transients with a warm yet strangely sibilant tuning. | 3BA |
JH Audio Diana | E | 700 | Dark | Mushy transients and the detailing capability of free phone earbuds. | 3BA |
All entries have been updated on the IEM ranking list.
New month, new year, new decade. My thanks to all my patrons who have stuck with me through the year and followed me through my journey of audio journalism. Shoutouts to my big money Patreon boys:
“McMadface”
“Desertscrub”
Rahul
Denis
Nicholas
Alexander
Galactus
12 thoughts on “The Big New Year’s Update: The Insignificants”
It feels rather insulting to see the Shuoer tapes on that list, considering I just made the conscious decision to shed a quarter of my biweekly salary to buy them…
Maybe this hobby isn’t for you, if you have so little disposable income. The tape isn’t particularly well regarded, and crinacle isn’t here to make you feel better about your purchases. He posts his own personal analysis and you can take that however you want.
Seeing the rather dreadful scores for the Stax 001 mk1 I wonder how the 002 and 001 mk2 (would) score.
Seems that the most insignificant one is the reviewer.
In your top ranking only very costly iems…
And so much iem tested in so little time by the same person makes your reviews irrelevant IMHO.
I’m sorry that I didn’t like your favourite IEM, whatever it may be. I hope your feelings aren’t too hurt.
At the end the goal of this site is to generate money and income for the publisher. So mixing in some disputable reviews helps to reach this target – this is normal nowadays.
If the reviewer has good ears or not, good taste or not means nothing, only traffic sells.
And you will see this note will vanish at the blink of a eye, don’t help to make money ;-).
So, what do you think, is this a trustworthy source?
I’m assuming that something I panned in this article was something you liked. If you want to read positive reviews, better find a different review site.
oh look at the tears of the fanbois here who spent their money on the gear listed trying to downplay the review and reviewer. salty tears are nice.
As for the guy who claims that only expensive stuff is ranked high, theres a couple of bargains on his list- including the one i personally own, s8pro. At sub 500 dollars, its a bargain and Crin ranks it high deservingly so since its sound matches up great to some of the reallly expensive stuff on his list. So yeah Crin doesnt mince words. He panned some expensive gear even from the most known companies.
Wow, actually I was considering the Equinox as my first High end Custom IEM. The only prospect that held me back was the insane price tag, now I got another reason to look elsewhere.
I was hoping to see Tin P1 and Ikko OH10 here, since they are in a very sweet spot… and hyped a lot 🙂
im buying audio sense t800 and i really appreciate crin criticism which makes me aware what im facing when i buy it. Also, crin said about t800 is nothing special and generic and its v-shape, to me thats great because i listen to generic songs a lot lol and its jack of all trades. He didnt say its bad so thats encouraging, because im buying it for the look too, its looks nice.